Author: Staff (Page 23 of 27)

Business and labor support more infrastructure spending

President Barack Obama is applauded by Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 25, 2011, while delivering his State of the Union address. UPI/Pablo Martinez Monsivais/POOL

In his State of the Union speech last night, President Obama made a strong case for investments necessary for our future, particularly infrastructure spending. There will be a big battle with the GOP over any spending initiative, but the president is getting support from an unlikely pairing.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO, often bitter foes in conflicts between business and labor, released a rare joint statement Wednesday in support of President Barack Obama’s call for additional infrastructure spending.

The business lobby and union conglomerate’s respective leaders offered a united front in applauding the broad pitch for domestic development in Obama’s State of the Union address.

“America’s working families and business community stand united in applauding President Obama’s call to create jobs and grow our economy through investment in our nation’s infrastructure,” their joint statement reads. “Whether it is building roads, bridges, high-speed broadband, energy systems and schools, these projects not only create jobs and demand for businesses, they are an investment in building the modern infrastructure our country needs to compete in a global economy.

“With the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO standing together to support job creation, we hope that Democrats and Republicans in Congress will also join together to build America’s infrastructure.”

It will be interesting to see if momentum build for more spending in this area.

Tiger Woods loses Gillette endorsement deal

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - NOVEMBER 11:  Golfer Tiger Woods (L) and cricketer Michael Clarke pose for a photograph during the launch of the Gillette Champions Junior Education Grant at the Crown Entertainment Complex on November 11, 2009 in Melbourne, Australia.  (Photo by Scott Barbour/Getty Images)

In the photo above we see Tiger Woods in happier times as he’s helping to pitch Gillette products. Since then times have changed and Tiger’s personal brand has been tarnished by scandal, and Gillette is the latest premium brand to end its relationship with Tiger Woods.

Procter & Gamble Co. will not renew its endorsement deal with Tiger Woods at the end of the year, adding another name to the list of companies that cut ties with the golfer after last year’s revelations of marital infidelities.

The company used Woods, Roger Federer, Lionel Messi and dozens of other athletes as part of its three-year “Gillette Champions” marketing campaign. Gillette said Thursday it was phasing out that program and not renewing the contract with Woods and several other athletes. It stopped using Woods himself in the campaign months ago.

This episode of course highlights the risks of celebrity endorsements though the Gillette campaign seemed like a pretty good one.

Online poker legislation is still a longshot

Poker fans all over American suddenly become interested in politics now that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is trying to slip in a provision legalizing online poker into the tax cut compromise.

Now some lawmakers want to allow U.S.-based casino companies to get into the game — and a cut of the $25 billion-a-year pie — by quietly pushing for a change in the law before the end of this year.

A draft bill, first reported by the Wall Street Journal and obtained by ABC News, would legalize online poker playing in the U.S., and establish licensing and reporting requirements for companies, as well as safeguards for consumers. It would also generate tax revenue from wagers, for state and federal governments.

Forms of online gambling other than poker would remain prohibited under the bill.

Legalization of online poker forums has long been sought by the U.S. casino industry which says federal gaming regulations have unfairly handicapped their business in a flourishing online marketplace and left American consumers vulnerable.

The problem is that the bill is rigged to favor established casino interests in Nevada, so you have many saying the bill isn’t fair and that it’s a payback to Reid’s campaign supporters.

That said, it’s ridiculous that millions of Americans are prohibited from participating in an activity they enjoy.

Where does it stand now? Many Republicans are against it – they want to tell you how you can live our life.

But Harry Reid insists he still pushing the deal in the lame-duck session. It’s an uphill climb, but anything can happen.

WikiLeaks turns its sights on corporate American and the banks

WikiLeaks has created another firestorm with its latest document dump, this time covering tons of diplomatic files concerning international relations.

Corporate American now needs to brace itself as well – WikiLeaks is gearing up for massive document dumps involving a major US bank, revealing thousands of pages of corporate secrets. More document dumps from other corporations will follow. Forbes reports on the story along with an interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Early next year, Julian Assange says, a major American bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out. Tens of thousands of its internal documents will be exposed on Wikileaks.org with no polite requests for executives’ response or other forewarnings. The data dump will lay bare the finance firm’s secrets on the Web for every customer, every competitor, every regulator to examine and pass judgment on.

When? Which bank? What documents? Cagey as always, Assange won’t say, so his claim is impossible to verify. But he has always followed through on his threats. Sitting for a rare interview in a London garden flat on a rainy November day, he compares what he is ready to unleash to the damning e-mails that poured out of the Enron trial: a comprehensive vivisection of corporate bad behavior. “You could call it the ecosystem of corruption,” he says, refusing to characterize the coming release in more detail. “But it’s also all the regular decision making that turns a blind eye to and supports unethical practices: the oversight that’s not done, the priorities of executives, how they think they’re fulfilling their own self-interest.”

****
Admire Assange or revile him, he is the prophet of a coming age of involuntary transparency. Having exposed military misconduct on a grand scale, he is now gunning for corporate America. Does Assange have unpublished, damaging documents on pharmaceutical companies? Yes, he says. Finance? Yes, many more than the single bank scandal we’ve been discussing. Energy? Plenty, on everything from BP to an Albanian oil firm that he says attempted to sabotage its competitors’ wells. Like informational IEDs, these damaging revelations can be detonated at will.

He jokes with the writer about calling these mega document dumps “megaleaks.”

The most interesting thing is this notion of “involuntary transparency.” In a time when huge corporations are amassing an incredible amount of power, Assange may have found the great equalizer. Corporations are generally amoral, and many of its executives are immoral, so now we the public will get a window into the workings of a company that blows past the carefully crafted public image. Can you imagine the frenzy this will create in the PR department of these companies?

« Older posts Newer posts »